
1851465 items (1851465 unread) in 479 feeds
"Vi är galet nöjda".
Vigor Sörmans företag Splay har gått från ett källarprojekt till ett digitalt mediehus med 80 anställda. Men en sömnlös natt för fyra år var han övertygad om att hela bolaget skulle bli en flopp.
Vid 23.38 under fredagskvällen larmades räddningstjänsten till en bilbrand i Sörforsa i Hudiksvalls kommun. När räddningstjänsten kom fram till platsen visade det sig att det rörde sig om ett falsklarm.
Philando Castile’s killer, police officer Jeromino Yanez, was acquitted of manslaughter and two counts of dangerous discharge of a firearm on Friday. The case of Castile’s shooting last July in a suburb of St. Paul, Minnesota had sparked mass protests after his girlfriend Diamond Reynolds posted a dramatic and wrenching video of the shooting’s aftermath. The video, taken with Reynolds’ 4-year-old daughter in the car, included footage of Castile lying in a puddle of blood after he was struck five times from seven shots.
Castile had informed the officer that he was carrying a firearm, for which he had a permit. Shortly thereafter, Yanez opened fire. In his opening statement, Yanez’s defense attorney claimed that Castile was holding his gun when he was shot.
“He has his hand on the gun,” Engh reportedly said during opening arguments. “The next command is, ‘Don’t pull it out.’ … [Yanez] can’t retreat … But for Mr. Castile’s continuous grip on the handgun, we would not be here.”
The prosecution argued that the 32-year-old school cafeteria supervisor with no violent criminal record was reaching for his driver’s license—as Yanez had instructed—and not his gun when he was shot. The forensic evidence and Reynold’s testimony would both seem to back up the prosecution’s account and rebut the defense’s version. Reynolds testified that he was trying to unbuckle his seatbelt so that he could get out his wallet and driver’s license when he was shot. As the Associated Press reported, this was supported by forensics:
Prosecutor Jeff Paulsen highlighted autopsy evidence in his closing argument, reminding the jury of a bullet wound to what would have been Castile’s trigger finger — and that there was no corresponding bullet damage nor wounds in the area of Castile’s right shorts pocket, where he carried his gun. He also cited testimony from first responders who saw Castile’s gun in his pocket as he was loaded onto a backboard.
The jury—which included ten white jurors and two black jurors—took 27 hours to deliberate and asked to review dashcam footage of the incident along with Reynolds’ harrowing cell phone video.
The Minneapolis StarTribune reported that the jury wasn’t allowed to have additional information it requested, without the judge specifying why:
Jurors asked the court Friday to reread the officer’s testimony in its entirety, their second request ... for statements he made regarding the fatal shooting of Philando Castile.
But Ramsey County District Court Judge William H. Leary III denied the request without elaborating, saying the reasons aren’t “important to share right now.”
As my colleague Leon Neyfakh noted in November when the officer was charged: “Yanez is the first Minnesota officer to be criminally charged in a police-involved death since 2000. In that time, the paper has reported, there have been more than 150 such incidents.”
The city of St. Anthony—for which Yanez worked as an officer—said it would end his employment because “the public will be best served if Officer Yanez is no longer a police officer in our city.” The city promised to offer him “a voluntary separation agreement to help him transition to another career.”
“There has always been a systemic problem in the state of Minnesota, and me thinking, common sense that we would get justice. But nevertheless the system continues to fail black people,” Castile’s mother, Valerie Castile, reportedly told media after the verdict. “I am so disappointed in the state of Minnesota. My son loved Minnesota. He had one tattoo on his body and it was of the Twin Cities. My son loved this city, and the city killed my son and the murderer gets away.”
*Correction, June 16, 2017, at 10:10 p.m: This post originally referred to the Minneapolis Star Tribune as the St. Paul Tribune. It also said Castile was shot in St. Paul rather than a suburb.
Vid 23.30 under natten till lördagen larmades SOS av en person som behövde hjälp att ta sig ned från en två meter hög staty i Hudiksvall.
If Senate Republicans want to meet their goal of passing a health care bill by the Fourth of July recess, they have exactly two weeks to do it. Congress is scheduled to recess at the end of business on June 30, which means Republicans have to move at breakneck pace while keeping debate to a minimum. What’s the rush? For any Americans who are aware that the Senate is racing to pass a tightly guarded health care bill—and if the GOP strategy works, there won’t be many of them!—Republicans are hoping their outrage dissipates over the holiday weekend. And the world goes on.
Passing this secretly developed, still-unfinished bill within two weeks would be a world historic achievement in underhanded policymaking. Put another way: This is the moment Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was born for. This, reader, is his jam.
Ask a different member of the Senate Republican leadership whether they are sticking to the June 30 deadline, and you’ll get a different answer. Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican, has always been more of an “end of July” guy. South Dakota Sen. John Thune, the No. 3 Republican, treats it as more of a “hope” or an “aspiration,” a way of focusing the mind.
McConnell and his team, though, have not been “deterred… from the goal of a floor vote before the July 4 recess,” the Washington Post reports. “[A]s McConnell’s team sees it, the options have all been vetted. Now, the difficult decisions about what to put in and leave out of the final bill are all that remain.”
Much of the media has been operating under the assumption that the Congressional Budget Office would need two weeks to score the Senate’s legislation. That’s why senators were hoping to finalize the language by Monday night. It’s now Friday, and the language still isn’t finalized. But the CBO and Senate Republicans have been interfacing on legislative options for a while now, and leaders hope that the score could come quicker since CBO wouldn’t be building an analysis from scratch. As Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso told Talking Points Memo, the issues they’re dealing with are “dial-able… so you can say, ‘If you set this number, it does this and if you set that number, it does that.’ ” In other words, the CBO is just waiting for decisions on certain inputs—growth rates for Medicaid spending, the length of the Medicaid expansion phase-out, expiration dates for certain taxes, lists of regulatory waivers that will be available to states, and so forth. Perhaps CBO could get a score done in, say, one week.
So who’s going to make those tough decisions about which inputs to include? It’s definitely not going to be all the Republican senators, and there’s definitely not going to be anything like consensus reached. Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey and Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, for example, are never going to agree about the proper growth rate for Medicaid. It will be up to McConnell and Cornyn to choose the proper balance that gets their conference closest to the 50 votes they need to pass the bill. That’s the phase they appear to be in right now. On the Hill Thursday afternoon, individual senators like Portman, Toomey, and Maine Sen. Susan Collins were ducking into McConnell’s office. The brainstorming sessions are finished, and now it’s about determining what each senator can live with.
Now, what about the Democrats? Let’s be generous and say McConnell settles on a recipe by over the weekend, and the CBO begins scoring early next week. The score comes back early the following week, and McConnell posts the bill. Is there much Democrats can do to stop it?
One theory among progressive activists is that Democrats could leverage the “vote-o-rama” process. Under reconciliation rules, senators can offer an unlimited number of amendments during the 20-hour debate period; after the debate, each filed amendment would be considered with an up-or-down vote. That rapid-fire voting session is referred to as a “vote-o-rama.”
Ezra Levin, an executive director with Indivisible, suggested on Twitter this week that Democrats should extend the “vote-o-rama” well past a long night’s work. He urged Democrats to threaten to “filibuster by amendment,” by filing tens of thousands of amendments to clog up chamber through the 2018 midterms.
But McConnell would have recourse. Though McConnell could let Democrats have their fun for a little while—at least to give off the veneer of a transparent, open process—he can eventually motion that the amendment process had become dilatory, the chair would rule in his favor, and—barring some appeals and other motions to draw the process out—the “vote-o-rama” would be finished. It might still be worth Democrats’ while to push ahead this way, though, to see how long they can draw out the process before McConnell breaks, and to please their base.
It comes down to this: If McConnell and a majority of senators want to rush this secret bill to a vote before the Fourth of July recess, then they can. McConnell needs 50 votes for the bill, and he needs 50 votes to bust through whatever procedural roadblocks Democrats lay before him.
Some Republican senators have begun to speak out against the secrecy of the project, noting that it makes them uncomfortable. That discomfort, however, has not been palpable enough for them to exert real leverage over the way McConnell has conducted the process so far. Any three Republican senators could have told the majority leader in early May that they wouldn’t vote for the bill unless it went through the normal open committee process. Maybe they didn’t think it would get this bad. Or maybe they agree with him: Speed and secrecy is the only way to do this.
Irreversible: President Trump’s opportunity to fill a large number of judicial vacancies (thanks, Senate Republicans) is going to let him transform the federal bench for years to come. Dahlia Lithwick looks at three of his first nominees, finding them horrifying: “The decision seems to have been made that these jobs should go to polemicists and bomb-throwers, performance artist lawyers who have spent their intellectual lives staking out absurd and often abhorrent legal positions.”
Here he comes: Mark Joseph Stern wonders what Robert Mueller, who is now looking into the business dealings of Trump’s associates, will find. “We still know little about what potential misconduct investigators are scrutinizing,” Stern writes. “But we know nothing they find is liable to be good news for Trump.”
Let her speak: Interrupted Sen. Kamala Harris is the liberal hero of the day. But Katy Waldman wonders whether some Democrats celebrating her would really support her for higher office, given her middle-of-the-road record on crime and punishment.
The long view: What is Amazon doing buying Whole Foods? Figuring out ways to make you pick up your own purchases, Daniel Gross theorizes. Cementing its place as the comprehensive go-to for all your shopping needs, Will Oremus thinks.
For fun: Watch Sigourney Weaver fight an alien invasion in a short film by Neill Blomkamp.
She’s good at that,
Rebecca
They say we are living in the golden age of television…and it’s certainly easy to see why. The content available to us is endless, and now it can appear in mere seconds if […]
The post 6 Shows You Need to Watch on Netflix Now appeared first on Geek.com.
They say we are living in the golden age of television…and it’s certainly easy to see why. The content available to us is endless, and now it can appear in mere seconds if […]
The post 7 Shows You Need to Watch on Netflix Now appeared first on Geek.com.
Under fredagskvällen var det full fart på den populära allsången på Villa Strömpis. NA gick dit för att spana in stämningen. Den visade sig vara på topp.
Under fredagskvällen var det full fart på den populära allsången på Villa Strömpis. NA gick dit för att spana in stämningen. Den visade sig vara på topp.
Stone is growing his own marijuana strain, and it's named "Tricky Dick." We're not joking.
The post Here’s Some Weird Stuff Roger Stone Said at a Weed Conference appeared first on Geek.com.
Stone is growing his own marijuana strain, and it's named "Tricky Dick." We're not joking.
The post Here’s Some Weird Stuff Roger Stone Said at a Weed Conference appeared first on Geek.com.
Vid 18-tiden på fredagskvällen inkom ett larm om en mindre markbrand i närheten av Geta skola. Branden var liten men eftersom en större skog fanns i närheten av platsen var det ändå risk för spridning.
– Det fanns ingen naturlig orsak till branden, säger räddningschef Thomas Mattson.
Det var två flickor som lekte vid skolan som såg branden och slog larm. Geta FBK stod för släckningsarbetet. (fb)
Vid 18-tiden på fredagskvällen inkom ett larm om en mindre markbrand i närheten av Geta skola. Branden var liten men eftersom en större skog fanns i närheten av platsen var det ändå risk för spridning.
– Det fanns ingen naturlig orsak till branden, säger räddningschef Thomas Mattson.
Det var två flickor som lekte vid skolan som såg branden och slog larm. Geta FBK stod för släckningsarbetet. (fb)
TERRORFINANSIERING. Många svenska företag använder Googles annonsnätverk i sin marknadsföring. Men bristande kontroll över annonsernas exponering gör att jihadister kan annonsera för att finansiera terrorverksamhet. ”Snart ödeläggs en vänskap”, lyder en annonstext som får en helt annan innebörd när den visas på jihadistsajten.
Den tidigare Göteborgaren och jihadisten Michael Skråmo använder annonsintäkter på en sajt där han ger sitt stöd för Islamiska Staten. Till sin hjälp har han Googles annonsnätverk där många svenska företag väljer att marknadsföra sina produkter. Men bristande kontroll över annonsernas exponering möjliggör finansiering av olaglig verksamhet.
Företaget Storytel.se hamnade oönskat på jihadistsajten. Det var inte vad de hade tänkt sig.
När Samtiden besöker sidan visas en annons från företaget Storytel.se som tillhandahåller ljudböcker i mobiltelefonen. Annonsen med texten ”Snart ödeläggs en vänskap”, får en helt annan betydelse i sammanhanget. Storytel är dock ovetandes om att deras annonser visas på detta sätt.
– Det här är baksidan av att ingå i stora annonsnätverk, olyckligtvis hamnar vi precis som många andra stora företag ibland på den här typen av sajter vilket förstås är helt emot vår avsikt, säger Tiina Nevala, PR-ansvarig på Storytel.
– Det är ju absolut inte ett sammanhang där vi vill synas.
Nu ska företaget försöka plocka bort annonsen från sidan.
– Vi kommer att undersöka om annonsen går att blockera och göra det om möjligt, säger hon.
Samtiden har sökt Google Sverige för en kommentar.
Inlägget Jihadister finansierar terror med annonsintäkter dök först upp på Samtiden.
Here’s our recap of what happened in online marketing today, as reported on Marketing Land and other places across the web.
From Marketing Land:Analytics
Business Issues
Content Marketing
Copywriting, Design & Usability
Domaining
E-Commerce
Email Marketing
General Internet Marketing
Internet Marketing Industry
MarTech
Mobile/Local Marketing
Reputation Management
Social Media
Video
Hur går era tankar när ni ser en så vanvårdad gravplats som den här (bilden) på Stora Kils vackra kyrkogård på sluttningen ner mot Fryken?
Ska man nödvändigtvis, som kyrkogårdsansvariga hävdar, behöva avvakta ett svar från ett totalt ointresserat dödsbo, innan en juridisk process kan inledas för att få ett rättsligt beslut om vanvård och därav följande tvångsförvaltning?
Eller finns det utrymme för lite sunt förnuft, och i avvaktan på processandet offra några minuter på gräsklippning, så att alla hundratals besökare till närliggande gravplatser slipper se eländet vecka efter vecka, månad efter månad, år efter år…
För så illa är det! Den här gravplatsen har inte varit ordentligt skött på åratal även om det inte brukar se lika eländigt ut som nu.
Jag tror inte att den politiker, som vänligt men bestämt beordrar uppsnyggning av gravplatsen i avvaktan på processandet, riskerar efterräkningar för ministerstyre.
Ingen behöver betvivla utgången av processen. Så vad allt handlar om, är att för omgivningens bästa, låta förnuftet råda och förekomma det juridiska utslaget.
The Pentagon plans to deploy 4,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, a Trump administration official has told the Associated Press:
The decision by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis could be announced as early as next week, the official said. It follows Trump’s move to give Mattis the authority to set troop levels and seeks to address assertions by the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan that he doesn’t have enough forces to help Afghanistan’s army against a resurgent Taliban insurgency. The rising threat posed by Islamic State extremists, evidenced in a rash of deadly attacks in the capital city of Kabul, has only fueled calls for a stronger U.S. presence, as have several recent American combat deaths.
The bulk of the additional troops will train and advise Afghan forces, according to the administration official, who wasn’t authorized to discuss details of the decision publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. A smaller number would be assigned to counterterror operations against the Taliban and IS, the official said.
A Pentagon spokesman told the AP that no final decision has been made. The AP says there are currently at least 10,400 U.S. troops already in the country, including at least 2,000 not included in the official 8,400 troop cap imposed by the Obama administration. That 2,000, the AP’s Lolita Baldor and Robert Burns write, includes “forces that are technically considered temporary even if they’ve been in the war zone for months.”
On Thursday, Slate’s Fred Kaplan wrote about the folly of letting Mattis set the administration’s Afghanistan strategy and predicted that more troops were on the way:
Mattis was an excellent wartime commander as a Marine. He is well-read in history and philosophy. But even the best Marines are trained mainly to execute policy, not to make it. And to the best wartime generals, the mandate of carrying out policy means winning the war. Retreating, withdrawing, drawing down—these might (or might not) be the preferences of a president, who views a war’s costs and benefits in the context of many other priorities, but they have little place in the thinking of a general whose job is to focus only on the war. ...
In other words, by turning over his authority to Mattis, Trump has all but guaranteed that more American troops will soon be sent to Afghanistan. Senior officers in the Pentagon have reportedly asked for another 5,000 troops in addition to the 8,000 still there. It’s a fair bet that Mattis will endorse the request. And it’s also a fair bet that they won’t be the last American troops sent over.
Slate contributor Phillip Carter recommended in May that the administration pursue a “minimalist counterterrorism strategy” in keeping with its America First rhetoric and noted a dissonance between that rhetoric and the blanket authority Trump has proved willing to give the Pentagon. “This dissonance may reflect a split of opinion between Trump and his political aides, and the military leaders he’s picked to run his Pentagon and National Security Council,” he wrote. “If he could restrain his penchant for dishonesty and misinformation, he might accidentally articulate the true goals and costs of our continued war in Afghanistan. But without a president who can level with his administration and the American people, the forever war will grind on, consuming lives and dollars for more years to come, with no end in sight and no way to judge whether it has all been worth it.”
On Thursday, Netflix reversed course and announced its support for the Net Neutrality Day of Action on its Twitter account:
Only two weeks ago, Netflix had seemingly decided to leave the net neutrality fight behind. At Recode’s Code Conference, CEO Reed Hastings said that net neutrality—the principle that prevents internet service providers such as Comcast and Verizon from slowing down certain websites and prioritizing others—was not its “primary battle” at the moment, adding that Netflix can “get the deals we want” and that it’s up to other companies, such as Amazon and Mozilla, to continue the fight.
In May, the Trump administration’s Federal Communications Commission voted to roll back regulations put in place by the Obama administration to protect net neutrality. The July 12 day of action will bring together multiple companies to “sound the alarm about the FCC’s attack on net neutrality,” according to organizer Fight for the Future’s website.
This choice to participate in the protest is more in line with the Netflix of past. In 2012, Hastings called out Comcast, a company he would later partner with, for its use of data caps against his video-streaming behemoth. In 2014, Netflix helped lead a coalition, which included eBay and Facebook, to lend support to net neutrality, and it took part in the September 2014 Internet Slowdown Day protest, where companies had symbolic loading symbols on their sites to show what might happen if net neutrality protections were erased.
But it’s also not the first time Netflix has sent conflicting messages about its stance on net neutrality. In 2014, Netflix made a deal with Comcast, a company that would likely benefit from the FCC’s abandonment of net neutrality, so that Netflix subscribers could get smoother streaming for its videos when watching via Comcast networks.
So was this all a ruse to make for a more dramatic reveal when it announced its support? As Slate’s Ian Prasad Philbrick reported, Hastings and Netflix are likely doing what’s best for business. And with so many Americans supporting net neutrality, maybe it decided this was.
This article originally appeared in Inside Higher Ed.
Days after opening the application window for its free public college tuition program, New York received more than 21,000 applications.
It looks like a quick clip for a state that had projected Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s signature free tuition program would cover about 22,000 students in its first year. But it’s not yet clear how many applicants will actually receive awards. The number of applicants is also still small in comparison to the roughly 1 million New York students who apply for financial aid in a year.
Cuomo’s office has said officials are thrilled with the number of applications. However, some policy experts worry that the program’s rapid start, short sign-up period, and high level of complexity have combined to create an unpredictable period for the state, its budget, and its public colleges and universities.
New York had received 21,106 Excelsior Scholarship applications as of 7 a.m. Monday, according to the state’s Higher Education Services Corporation. The application period opened June 7 and runs for about six weeks, through July 21.
Few other details were available Tuesday. About a third of the applications came from students who are either already enrolled in the City University of New York system or planning to enroll this fall as freshmen, according to a CUNY spokesman. A large majority of the CUNY applicants were continuing students, he said.
New York residents attending a City University of New York or State University of New York institution can apply for the Excelsior Scholarship, a last-dollar award that pays for tuition costs after other sources of financial aid have been applied. Lawmakers approved the scholarship this spring. It will be phased in over three years, covering families with annual incomes of up to $100,000 this year. It will ultimately cover students from families with incomes of up to $125,000 per year—making an estimated 940,000 families with college-age students eligible.
Some of the state’s community colleges and four-year institutions project enrolling a low number of students who qualify for Excelsior Scholarships in the upcoming academic year. They caution that they’re still waiting to learn exactly how the program will affect enrollment, though.
“Because the scholarship is across the board, it’s a big experiment,” said Kevin Drumm, president of the State University of New York Broome Community College outside of Binghamton. “Right now it looks OK for us, but as with all of us, we don’t know what our actual enrollment and market mix is going to look like.”
SUNY Broome typically enrolls between 4,800 and 5,500 full-time equivalent students annually, Drumm said. It’s difficult for the community college to project next year’s class for several reasons: Its fall application deadline is July 1, and enrollments can vary drastically from week to week over the spring and summer, Drumm said. Three weeks ago, registrations were down year over year. Now tit’s up about 5.5 percent, measuring full-time equivalent students.
The Excelsior Scholarship is unlikely to go to a vast majority of SUNY Broome’s students, however. Since it’s a last-dollar scholarship, it will not be awarded to students who already have their tuition costs covered by other programs, like New York’s generous Tuition Assistance Program. About 65 percent of SUNY Broome students already have their full tuition costs covered, Drumm said.
SUNY Broome looked at a small test batch of freshman applicants and determined 35 percent would be eligible for the Excelsior Scholarship in the upcoming year based on its income requirements. But after factoring in other likely financial aid awards, only about one-tenth of those students would receive an award.
In other words, an estimated 3.5 percent of the freshman class would receive Excelsior Scholarships. But that estimate may not be in line with final numbers, and it could go up in future years as the program’s income ceiling rises and as more potential students become comfortable with attending classes under the free tuition program, Drumm said.
It will take time for students to learn the details of the program, Drumm said. For instance, developmental math and English don’t count toward a requirement that students complete 30 credits per year. Some students aren’t clear on what charges are guaranteed to be covered, either.
“The one thing is people who call the financial aid office and just think they’re going to get a full scholarship,” Drumm said. “They’re not aware it’s just tuition dollars. They’re calling to ask, ‘Will this cover room and board?’ ”
Some four-year institutions are also projecting a relatively low percentage of students qualifying for the free tuition program in its first year. SUNY Potsdam in northern New York estimates about 6 percent of its 4,000 undergraduate students will be eligible to receive funding from the scholarship, according to Rick Miller, executive vice president.
SUNY Potsdam saw inquiries from prospective undergraduates jump sharply this spring. But applications only rose slightly, and enrollments for the fall freshman class are actually tracking down incrementally from last year.
“Our enrollment management staff believes this may be due to families waiting to find out about eligibility for the Excelsior Scholarship first, before making final decisions,” Miller said in an email.
That meshes with the predictions of administrators at SUNY Brockport, west of Rochester.
“I think you’re going to see later movement because of the timing of when everything was announced,” said Robert Wyant, SUNY Brockport’s director of admissions.
The four-year SUNY Brockport enrolls about 7,000 undergraduates. This fall’s freshman class looks like it will be about the same size as last fall’s, when it hit an all-time high of 1,200.
Wyant was not prepared to release any estimates for how many of his institution’s students will receive Excelsior Scholarships.
“It’s still so new,” he said. “It’s hard to gauge it.”
The governor’s office has hailed the number of applications.
“We’re thrilled with the tremendous interest in the Excelsior Scholarship we’ve seen from New Yorkers and look forward to making tuition-free college a reality for middle-class students starting this fall,” a spokeswoman said in a statement.
But outside observers were not so quick with compliments.
From October to December of last year, about 275,000 New Yorkers submitted a Free Application for Federal Student Aid, said Judith Scott-Clayton, an associate professor of economics and education at Teachers College, Columbia University. Over a million filed a FAFSA for the entire 2016–17 academic year.
Those numbers are by no means perfect comparisons to Excelsior Scholarship applications—they would include, for example, students attending college in other states and students attending New York’s many private colleges and universities. But they do show the larger scale of total students applying for financial aid in the state.
“Twenty-one thousand is not a lot, in the grand scheme of the number of people in New York going to college,” Scott-Clayton said.
Scott-Clayton also voiced concerns about several other Excelsior Scholarship details, starting with the timing of the application period—which started very soon after lawmakers reached a deal to create the program. A summer application period is completely out of sync from the typical financial aid cycle, she said. Most students have already decided where they will attend college by the summer.
The short time period between application and the start of classes this fall is hard on institutions, too. The scholarship isn’t simply a bucket of state money landing in their laps.
It covers up to $5,500 worth of tuition, but four-year in-state undergraduate tuition at SUNY is typically listed at $6,470 per year. The system is required to provide additional awards to Excelsior Scholarship students in order to cover their entire tuition cost up to $6,470. The 2017–18 state budget included maintenance of effort payments and a repayment to SUNY to cover those costs.
New York appropriated $87 million for the Excelsior Scholarship’s first year. If more than the estimated 22,000 students receive awards, the governor’s office says it is open to adjusting its budget to support the program.
Rolling out the program so quickly is a risk and an administrative burden, Scott-Clayton said.
“It just seems like the best idea would have been for everybody to have more time to figure out how this is going to work,” she said.
Cuomo’s office noted that the free tuition program was only approved by lawmakers this spring. The governor made it a top priority this year, and leaders wanted to have it in place as soon as possible.
Critics have questioned numerous other details about the Excelsior Scholarship.
Some have questioned the program’s 30-credits-completed-per-year requirement and an after-graduation residency requirement with provisions turning past awards into loans if students do not stay in the state for a certain number of years. Many have also pointed out that the scholarship does not cover mandatory fees, which can add up at public institutions and prevent low-income students from being able to enroll or finish their degrees.
At the end of the day, the program’s caveats matter to students and families, Scott-Clayton said.
“I think they absolutely struggle with the complexity,” Scott-Clayton said. “It’s not nearly as simple as it was marketed.”
President Donald Trump announced on Friday a rollback of some of the Obama administration’s policies that loosened restrictions on United States–Cuba economic relations.
"I am canceling the previous administration's completely one-sided deal," he announced to massive applause at an event in Miami in front of Cuban dissidents.
Despite this rhetoric, Trump’s moves appear to be less far-reaching than he described. For example, Trump is maintaining and allowing to be maintained the embassies that Obama opened and allowed to be opened in Havana and Washington. The president is also maintaining policies that allowed Cubans to visit their families on the island and to send money to them. The administration would also allow U.S. companies to continue commercial transportation—such as air flights—from the United States to Cuba.
There were some major changes, though. In a fact sheet about the move, the White House announced that it “enhances travel restrictions to better enforce the statutory ban on United States tourism to Cuba.”
Obama’s policy shift had allowed visitors to travel to the island for educational purposes but loosely enforced that restriction to the point of seeming to allow tourism in practice. Trump’s move promised to limit such travel for nonacademic purposes to approved group travel, saying “self-directed, individual travel permitted by the Obama administration will be prohibited.”
The brunt of the policy, meanwhile, focused on preventing U.S. visitors from spending money in the mostly Cuban-controlled travel industries, such as hotels restaurants.
“Stays at hotels run by the Cuban military conglomerate—many brand-name hotels—will be prohibited, but a senior White House official suggested travelers who had already booked trips would be accommodated,” the Miami Herald reported.
More from the newspaper:
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio was instrumental in drafting Trump’s changes, with help from Miami Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart. Other Cuban-American lawmakers started getting briefed on the policy Thursday.
Trump’s policy will not reinstate wet foot, dry foot, the policy that allowed Cuban immigrants who reached U.S. soil to remain in the country. It will not alter the U.S. trade embargo, which can only be lifted by Congress. And it will not limit travel or money sent by Cuban Americans, as former President George W. Bush did—though fewer Cuban government officials will be allowed to come to the U.S. and receive money than under Obama.
The Los Angeles Times reported that the new policy risked alienating other Latin American countries that had been in favor of more open United States relations with Cuba. From the Times:
The timing and place of Trump’s announcement raised some eyebrows. His vice president and three cabinet secretaries have been hosting leaders of Mexico and Central America in Miami for a two-day conference on immigration and regional prosperity.
….
“The optics are not the best,” said a senior international Latin American finance official in Miami for the conference. Like many diplomats, he spoke on condition of anonymity to talk about the Trump administration.
“The entire region welcomed the United States’ normalization of relations with Cuba,” said Cynthia Arnson, director of the Latin America program at the nonpartisan Wilson Center think tank in Washington. "The hardening of policy can only add to the growing distance between Washington and the region’s democracies.”
The Trump White House announced that the Treasury Department had 30 days to issue these new regulations on businesses and travel, and that the policy would not take effect until those changes were finalized, “a process that may take several months.”
You know Daleks and Davros and Missy the Master, Angels and Silence hell-bent on disaster. But do you recall the most underrated Doctor Who villains of all? Each week, I will dig into […]
The post ‘Doctor Who’ Underrated Friend of the Week: Alpha Centauri appeared first on Geek.com.
You know Daleks and Davros and Missy the Master, Angels and Silence hell-bent on disaster. But do you recall the most underrated Doctor Who villains of all? Each week, I will dig into […]
The post ‘Doctor Who’ Underrated Friend of the Week: Alpha Centauri appeared first on Geek.com.
The 2017 iPad that Apple launched earlier this year was inexpensive, but it was also about dealing with various compromises. The display, for instance, lacked anti-glare and lamination properties of more modern iPads, and the speakers weren’t nearly as good as the latest Apple hardware.
But price can be a compelling feature as well, and the 2017 iPad’s $329 entry point appealed to the masses.
The new iPad Pro, however, concedes nothing to price. It’s an all-in product that cuts no corners. Its starting price is basically double the standard iPad at $649, and can quickly balloon up to entry-level MacBook Pro and iMac territory.
But is the updated iPad Pro, with its newly available 10.5-inch form factor and 120Hz ProMotion display, worth it? Have a look at our hands-on video walkthrough for more details. more…
Allmänna reklamationsnämnden (ARN) ger en örebroare rätt mot ett företag som sålt honom en el-scooter.
Allmänna reklamationsnämnden (ARN) ger en örebroare rätt mot ett företag som sålt honom en el-scooter.
– Sedan vi tog över ägandet av klubben 2012 har ett av våra mål varit att få arrangera en stortävling likt Nordea Masters, säger klubbens vd Mats Sterner.
Europatourspelaren Johan Edfors är en av klubbens delägare. Han har förädlat och utvecklat nio av de 18 hålen.
Claes Nilsson är director för Golf Scandinavia på Lagardère Sports som äger rättigheterna till tävlingen. Han säger:
– För oss som arrangör är det viktigt att tävlingen roterar mellan Sveriges största orter och bästa banor. Göteborg med omnejd har inte stått som arrangör sedan 1996.